Extracto:


Perhaps the most important reason I left the Left was this: the Left
has betrayed humanity in the sense that it does not seek to eradicate
or resist the threat of totalitarian ideology. If the Left had any
cause for social justice, if it had to justify its own existence, it
would be on the front lines of defending against totalitarianism. But
it is the right, the conservatives, that is speaking up against the
threat of radical Islam. And they are doing so based upon their real
belief in social justice. The leftists were supposed to be on the
forefront in terms of what they pretend they stand for.

I voted for Al Gore. I supported Al Gore. I consider him a friend. I
worked on his campaign. But Gore does not speak about radical Islam.
He mostly speaks about one thing: the environment. And he does this
because it is fashionable. Now I don't disagree with Gore on the need
to address environmental issues, but we have a greater threat right
now from Islamic terrorism and demographic invasion. I am, by the way,
more afraid of demographic invasion than terrorism. Demographic
conquest is absolute -- the most permanent form of conquest...

The enemy is Islamic totalitarianism -- Universal Jihad. Whether you
are talking about Serbia, Kashmir, Chechnya, Thailand, or Israel --
all these peoples are resisting one thing and one thing only,
Universal Jihad. The problem is when a nation or a leader does not get
the idea before it consumes its resources or becomes demographically
overwhelmed, as is the case in all of the nations who are suffering
now. The thing to understand about Universal Jihad within Islam is
that they love to believe in pluralism in Europe, in the United
States, in India and in all infidel lands -- they insist upon
tolerance. But when it comes to places like Saudi Arabia, where they
have total control, they deny basic human value to non-Muslims, and
even non-Arab Muslims like a Pakistani Muslim immigrant to Saudi
Arabia...

I would say that the true axis of evil is Saudi Arabia, Iran, and
Pakistan. These three have been the primary exporters of Jihadists
throughout the world.

But the most important thing is that we have to admit that demographic
conquest is the most permanent form of conquest. Therefore, we must
support all nations currently struggling with radical Islamic
footholds within their societies. The reality is that no place in the
world where radical Islam has gained demographic dominance, has it
ever been extricated. And it has been its goal for over 1400 years to
aggressively spread and multiply by birth or by sword. America needs
to openly face up to this reality.

The Islamists are clever. They begin by first exporting their surplus
population to free and open societies. Then those immigrants begin to
demand ideological tolerance and conformity to their views and then
use the democratic process to change the laws. Then what laws they
cannot change, is followed by civil disobedience, then unrest, then
Jihad, but is was always Jihad even from the innocuous beginning.

We have seen Islamic unrest in Denmark, in France, and in England and
the pattern can be clearly seen. In Copenhagen, there are places where
a woman cannot even walk alone on the street. There are similar
Islamic enclaves in the Netherlands and in England. In England, if an
Englishman marries a second woman he goes to jail, but a Pakistani can
legally immigrate with his two wives, practice Sharia, and even go on
welfare and it is ok.

We have to learn from the failed experiment of Europe. A large portion
of Muslim immigrants have absolutely no interest in assimilating into
their host societies. Tolerance in a western culture that fails to
require assimilation is an open door to internal demographic
annihilation. My point is that in all of history, there is a post
Communist society, there is a post Nazi society, but never a post
Islamic society. Wherever Jihad has displaced a society, it has
remained.

We are at a point in history that domestic and foreign policy are now
inextricably tied together because of immigration which it should be
the foreign policy of any free society to first address the issue of
internal assimilation of existing immigrants. Then, we need to enforce
human rights compatibility between the U.S. and nations with citizens
wishing to immigrate...

We should stop immigration from any nation that practices any form of
Sharia. I am not, of course, referring to instances where, let us say,
dissidents, refugees or others are fleeing Sharia, want to free
themselves from it, are threatened by it etc. I am referring to those
who believe in Sharia and want to impose it on the host society to
which they come. It is useless for America to have laws and an
ideology but then allow people to come into the country who
fundamentally disagree with the very ideal of America and want to
destroy it. The first moral responsibility of any nation is to protect
its way of life as chosen by its citizenry.


http://www.frontpagemagazine.com/Art...D-6EED0326CF2B





--
Give us back our countries: Stop the criminal multiculturalism ideology
enforced upon the white world against the will of its peoples, leading to
mass immigration from the third-world: Mul-cul + pol-corr = lethal mixture
for the white world. And give us back our freedom: Dismantle all
surveillance technology.

Estoy soltando mi cordura!